| Summary table |
| Variable |
Value |
Source |
| GRB_name_Fermi |
GRB090320045 |
|
| T0 |
1:05:08.415 UTC |
Fermi_GBM |
| ra |
108.3000° |
Fermi_GBM |
| decl |
-43.3000° |
Fermi_GBM |
| pos_error |
1.20e+01° |
Fermi_GBM |
| T90 |
2.368 s |
Fermi_GBM |
| T90_error |
0.272 s |
Fermi_GBM |
| T90_start |
1:05:08.415 UTC |
Fermi_GBM |
| fluence |
4.45e-07 erg/cm² |
Fermi_GBM |
| fluence_error |
2.31e-08 erg/cm² |
Fermi_GBM |
| T100 |
2.368 s |
|
| GBM_located |
True |
|
| mjd |
54910.04523628472 |
Fermi_GBM |
| Fermi GBM table |
| GRB_name_Fermi |
GRB090320045 |
| trigger_name |
bn090320045 |
| ra |
108.3000° |
| decl |
-43.3000° |
| pos_error |
1.20e+01° |
| datum |
2009-03-20 |
| t_trigger |
1:05:10.527 UTC |
| T90 |
2.368 s |
| T90_error |
0.272 s |
| T90_start |
1:05:08.415 UTC |
| fluence |
4.45e-07 erg/cm² |
| fluence_error |
2.31e-08 erg/cm² |
| flux_1024 |
1.42e+00 erg/cm²/s |
| flux_1024_error |
1.26e-01 erg/cm²/s |
| flux_1024_time |
-1.34e+00 erg/cm²/s |
| flux_64 |
2.80e+00 erg/cm²/s |
| flux_64_error |
6.54e-01 erg/cm²/s |
| GCN 9022 table |
| GRB_name |
GRB090320C |
| GCN_number |
9022 |
| Detection_method |
Fermi GBM Det |
| t_trigger |
1:05:10.530 UTC |
| ra |
108.2000° |
| decl |
-43.3000° |
| Circular_text |
TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR
NUMBER: 9022
SUBJECT: GRB 090320C: Fermi GBM Detection
DATE: 09/03/23 21:38:57 GMT
FROM: Vandiver Chaplin at UAH/Fermi-GBM
V.Chaplin (UAH) reports on behalf of the Fermi GBM Team:
"At 01:05:10.53 UT on 20 March 2009, the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
triggered and located GRB 090320C (trigger 259203912 / 090320045).
The on-ground calculated location, using the GBM trigger
data, is RA = 108.2, DEC = -43.3 (J2000 degrees,
equivalent to 7h 13m, -43d 18'), with an uncertainty
of 15.0 degrees (radius, 1-sigma containment,
statistical only; there is additionally a systematic
error which is currently estimated to be 2 to 3 degrees).
The angle from the Fermi LAT boresight is 40 degrees.
The GBM light curve has a duration (T90) of about 4 s (8-1000 keV),
with a peak at about T0-2 seconds.
Since the source is weak, the time-averaged spectrum is poorly
constrained."
|