| Summary table |
|---|
| Variable |
Value |
Source |
| GRB_name_Fermi |
GRB090412061 |
|
| T0 |
1:28:04.421 UTC |
Fermi_GBM |
| ra |
1.3000° |
Fermi_GBM |
| decl |
-51.9000° |
Fermi_GBM |
| pos_error |
8.35e+00° |
Fermi_GBM |
| T90 |
0.896 s |
Fermi_GBM |
| T90_error |
0.264 s |
Fermi_GBM |
| T90_start |
1:28:04.421 UTC |
Fermi_GBM |
| fluence |
1.25e-07 erg/cm² |
Fermi_GBM |
| fluence_error |
1.36e-08 erg/cm² |
Fermi_GBM |
| T100 |
0.896 s |
|
| GBM_located |
True |
|
| mjd |
54933.06116228009 |
Fermi_GBM |
| Fermi GBM table |
|---|
| GRB_name_Fermi |
GRB090412061 |
| trigger_name |
bn090412061 |
| ra |
1.3000° |
| decl |
-51.9000° |
| pos_error |
8.35e+00° |
| datum |
2009-04-12 |
| t_trigger |
1:28:05.253 UTC |
| T90 |
0.896 s |
| T90_error |
0.264 s |
| T90_start |
1:28:04.421 UTC |
| fluence |
1.25e-07 erg/cm² |
| fluence_error |
1.36e-08 erg/cm² |
| flux_1024 |
8.67e-01 erg/cm²/s |
| flux_1024_error |
1.96e-01 erg/cm²/s |
| flux_1024_time |
-9.60e-01 erg/cm²/s |
| flux_64 |
4.12e+00 erg/cm²/s |
| flux_64_error |
1.20e+00 erg/cm²/s |
| GCN 9132 table |
|---|
| GRB_name |
GRB090412A |
| GCN_number |
9132 |
| Detection_method |
Fermi GBM Det |
| t_trigger |
1:28:05.250 UTC |
| ra |
0.3000° |
| decl |
-49.8000° |
| Circular_text |
TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR
NUMBER: 9132
SUBJECT: GRB 090412: Fermi GBM detection
DATE: 09/04/16 17:49:35 GMT
FROM: Rob Preece at UAH
Rob Preece (UAH) reports on behalf of the Fermi GBM Team:
"At 01:28:05.25 UT on 12 April 2009, the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
triggered and located a weak GRB 090412 (trigger 261192487 / 090412061).
The on-ground calculated location, using the GBM trigger
data, is RA = 0.3, DEC = -49.8 (J2000 degrees,
equivalent to 00 h 01 m, -48 d 48 '), with an uncertainty
of 9.6 degrees (radius, 1-sigma containment,
statistical only; there is additionally a systematic
error which is currently estimated to be 2 to 3 degrees).
The angle from the Fermi LAT boresight is 71 degrees.
The GBM light curve consists of a weak pulse
with a duration (T90) of about 0.5 s (8-1000 keV).
Since the source is very weak, it is not possible to
perform any spectral analysis."
|