GRB160219A

This page lists all entries on GRB160219A in GRBweb

Summary Fermi GBM GCN 19035 GCN 19041 GCN 19070

Summary table
Variable Value Source
GRB_name_Fermi GRB160219289
T0 6:56:13.245 UTC GCN_circulars,Konus-Wind Det
ra 1.3524° GCN_circulars,IPN Triangulation
decl -21.9573° GCN_circulars,IPN Triangulation
T90 3.52 s Fermi_GBM
T90_error 0.181 s Fermi_GBM
T90_start 6:56:18.138 UTC Fermi_GBM
fluence 1.11e-06 erg/cm² Fermi_GBM
fluence_error 7.52e-08 erg/cm² Fermi_GBM
T100 8.413 s
GBM_located False
mjd 57437.2890421875 GCN_circulars,Konus-Wind Det
Fermi GBM table
GRB_name_Fermi GRB160219289
trigger_name bn160219289
ra 1.3525°
decl -21.9572°
pos_error 6.82e+00°
datum 2016-02-19
t_trigger 6:56:18.138 UTC
T90 3.52 s
T90_error 0.181 s
T90_start 6:56:18.138 UTC
fluence 1.11e-06 erg/cm²
fluence_error 7.52e-08 erg/cm²
flux_1024 2.95e+00 erg/cm²/s
flux_1024_error 1.84e-01 erg/cm²/s
flux_1024_time -6.40e-02 erg/cm²/s
flux_64 1.92e+01 erg/cm²/s
flux_64_error 1.11e+00 erg/cm²/s
GCN 19035 table
GRB_name GRB160219A
GCN_number 19035
Detection_method IPN Triangulation
t_trigger 6:56:18 UTC
ra 1.3524°
decl -21.9573°
Circular_text TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 19035 SUBJECT: IPN Triangulation of GRB 160219A (short/hard) DATE: 16/02/20 20:07:41 GMT FROM: Dmitry Svinkin at Ioffe Institute D. Svinkin, S. Golenetskii, R. Aptekar, D. Frederiks, A. Kozlova, and T. Cline on behalf of the Konus-Wind team, K. Hurley, on behalf of the IPN, V. Connaughton, M. S. Briggs, C. Meegan, V. Pelassa, and A. Goldstein, on behalf of the Fermi GBM team, A. von Kienlin, X. Zhang, A. Rau, V. Savchenko, E. Bozzo, and C. Ferrigno, on behalf of the INTEGRAL SPI-ACS GRB team, and S. Barthelmy, J. Cummings, N. Gehrels, H. Krimm, and D. Palmer, on behalf of the Swift-BAT team, report: A short-duration GRB 160219A has been detected by Konus-Wind, Fremi (GBM; trigger 477557782), Swift (BAT), and INTEGRAL (SPI-ACS), so far, at about 24978 s UT (06:56:18). The burst was outside the coded field of view of the BAT. We have triangulated it to a preliminary, 3 sigma error box whose coordinates are: -------------------------------- RA(2000), deg Dec(2000), deg -------------------------------- Center: 1.3524 -21.9573 Corners: 352.3480 -23.1597 350.3712 -23.9066 9.4050 -15.0431 7.6407 -16.0195 --------------------------------- The error box area is 18.39 sq. deg, and its maximum dimension is 20.0 deg (the minimum one is 58 arcmin). The Sun distance was about 20 deg. This box may be improved. A triangulation map is posted at http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB160219_T24973/IPN/ The time history and spectrum will be given in forthcoming GCN Circulars.
GCN 19041 table
GRB_name GRB160219A
GCN_number 19041
Detection_method Fermi GBM Det
t_trigger 6:56:18.140 UTC
ra 350.6000°
decl -29.7000°
Circular_text TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 19041 SUBJECT: GRB 160219A: Fermi GBM detection DATE: 16/02/21 10:45:48 GMT FROM: Hoi-Fung Yu at MPE H.-F. Yu (MPE) and O. J. Roberts (UCD), report on behalf of the Fermi GBM Team: "At 06:56:18.14 UT on the 19th of February 2015, the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) triggered and located GRB 160219A (trigger 477557782 / 160219289). The on-ground calculated location, using the Fermi GBM trigger data, is RA = 350.6, Dec = -29.7 deg. (J2000 degrees, equivalent to 23h 22m 24s, -29d 42'), with a statistical uncertainty of 6.34 degrees (radius, 1-sigma containment, statistical only; there is additionally a systematic error which we have characterized as a core-plus-tail model, with 90% of GRBs having a 3.7 deg error and a small tail suffering a larger than 10 deg systematic error. [Connaughton et al. 2015, ApJS, 216, 32] ). The angle from the Fermi LAT boresight for the IPN position is 51 degrees (Svinkin et al. 2016, GCN 19035). The GBM light curve consists of two short pulses with a duration (T90) of about 3.5 s (50-300 keV). The time-averaged spectrum from T0-0.064 s to T0+3.456 s is best fit by a power law function with an exponential high-energy cutoff. The power law index is -0.97 +/- 0.15 and the cutoff energy, parameterized as Epeak, is 689 +/- 308 keV. The event fluence (10-1000 keV) in this time interval is (1.25 +/- 0.12)E-06 erg/cm^2. The 64-ms peak photon flux measured starting from T0+0.00 s in the 10-1000 keV band is 19.2 +/- 1.1 ph/s/cm^2. The spectral analysis results presented above are preliminary; final results will be published in the GBM GRB Catalog."
GCN 19070 table
GRB_name GRB160219A
GCN_number 19070
Detection_method Konus-Wind Det
t_trigger 6:56:13.245 UTC
Circular_text TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 19070 SUBJECT: Konus-Wind observation of GRB 160219A DATE: 16/02/24 13:42:14 GMT FROM: Anna Kozlova at Ioffe Institute A. Kozlova, S. Golenetskii, R. Aptekar, D. Frederiks, P. Oleynik, M. Ulanov, D. Svinkin, A. Tsvetkova, A.Lysenko, and T. Cline, on behalf of the Konus-Wind team, report: The short-duration, hard-spectrum GRB 160219A (IPN triangulation: Svinkin et al., GCN 19035; Fermi-GBM detection: Yu & Roberts, GCN 19041) triggered Konus-Wind at T0=24973.245 s UT (06:56:13.245). The burst light curve starts with a short (~0.09 s) pulse, followed by a weaker pulse at ~T0+3.1 s (with a duration of~0.96 s). The K-W light curve of this burst is available at http://www.ioffe.rssi.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB160219_T24973/ As observed by Konus-Wind, the burst had a fluence of 1.57(-0.21,+0.25)x10^-6 erg/cm2 and a 16-ms peak flux, measured from ~T0-0.028 s, of 1.22(-0.27,+0.27)x10^-5 erg/cm2/s (both in the 20 - 1200 keV energy range). Since the bulk of the burst emission was detected before the trigger, the spectral analysis was performed using the KW 3-channel light curve data. Modelling the K-W 3-channel spectrum of the first pulse (measured from T0-0.066 s to T0+0.022 s) by the cutoff power law yields the following model parameters: the photon index alpha = -0.29(-0.37,+0.55), and the peak energy Ep = 753(-187,+395) keV. Modelling the K-W 3-channel spectrum of the second pulse (measured from T0+3.072 s to T0+4.032 s) by the cutoff power law yields the following model parameters: the photon index alpha = -0.98(-0.22,+0.73), and a lower limit on the Ep: Ep > 760 keV. All the quoted errors are estimated at the 1 sigma confidence level. All the presented results are preliminary.