GRB190409A

This page lists all entries on GRB190409A in GRBweb

Summary GCN 24081 GCN 24093

Summary table
Variable Value Source
T0 13:01:21 UTC GCN_circulars,Swift Det
ra 324.9210° GCN_circulars,Swift Det
decl -46.6070° GCN_circulars,Swift Det
GBM_located False
mjd 58582.542604166665 GCN_circulars,Swift Det
GCN 24081 table
GRB_name GRB190409A
GCN_number 24081
Detection_method Swift Det
t_trigger 13:01:21 UTC
ra 324.9210°
decl -46.6070°
Circular_text TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 24081 SUBJECT: GRB 190409A: Swift detection of a possible burst DATE: 19/04/09 14:16:59 GMT FROM: Scott Barthelmy at NASA/GSFC A. D'Ai (INAF-IASFPA), S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), M. G. Bernardini (INAF-OAB), D. N. Burrows (PSU), V. D'Elia (SSDC), P. A. Evans (U Leicester), J.D. Gropp (PSU), J. A. Kennea (PSU), N. J. Klingler (PSU), N. P. M. Kuin (UCL-MSSL), K. L. Page (U Leicester), D. M. Palmer (LANL), B. Sbarufatti (PSU), M. H. Siegel (PSU) and A. Tohuvavohu (PSU) report on behalf of the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory Team: At 13:01:21 UT, the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) triggered and located possible GRB 190409A (trigger=897653). Swift did not immediately slew due to an observing constraint. The BAT on-board calculated location is RA, Dec 324.921, -46.607, which is RA(J2000) = 21h 39m 41s Dec(J2000) = -46d 36' 25" with an uncertainty of 3 arcmin (radius, 90% containment, including systematic uncertainty). As is typical for image triggers, the real-time light curve does not show anything significant. The XRT began observing the field at 13:50:28.1 UT, 2946.9 seconds after the BAT trigger. No source was detected in 1.2 ks of promptly downlinked data, which covered 55% of the BAT error circle. We are waiting for the full dataset to detect and localise the XRT counterpart. UVOT took a finding chart exposure of 150 seconds with the White filter starting 2950 seconds after the BAT trigger. No credible afterglow candidate has been found in the initial data products. Results from the 2.7'x2.7' sub-image are not available at this time. The 8'x8' region for the list of sources generated on-board covers 100% of the BAT error circle. The list of sources is typically complete to about 18 mag. No correction has been made for the expected extinction corresponding to E(B-V) of 0.02. Burst Advocate for this burst is A. D'Ai (antonino.dai AT gmail.com). Please contact the BA by email if you require additional information regarding Swift followup of this burst. In extremely urgent cases, after trying the Burst Advocate, you can contact the Swift PI by phone (see Swift TOO web site for information: http://www.swift.psu.edu/)
GCN 24093 table
GRB_name GRB190409A
GCN_number 24093
Detection_method Swift-BAT Det
ra 325.0326°
decl -46.6064°
Circular_text TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 24093 SUBJECT: GRB 190409A: ground analysis reveals a likely spurious event DATE: 19/04/10 14:55:51 GMT FROM: Antonino D'Ai at IASF-PA A. D'Ai (INAF-IASFPA), A. Y. Lien (GSFC/UMBC), A. A. Breeveld (MSSL-UCL) report on behalf of the Swift team: Using Swift/BAT data set from T-60 to T+243 sec from the recent telemetry downlink, we report further analysis of the possible GRB 190409A (trigger #897653, D'Ai et al. GCN 24081). The BAT image significance has decreased to 3.7 sigma, and thus is consistent with a noise fluctuation. We have analysed 2.8 ks of Photon Counting (PC) mode XRT data, collected between T0+3.0 ks and T0+10.2 ks. One uncatalogued X-ray source has been detected but outside the BAT error circle at 4.3 arcmin from the Swift/BAT position reported in GCN 24081. The source is below the RASS limit and shows no definitive signs of fading. Details of this source are given below: Source 1: RA (J2000): 325.0326 = 21:40:7.82 Dec (J2000): -46.6064 = -46:36:23.0 Error: 7.7 arcsec (radius, 90% conf.) Count-rate: (4.3 [+1.8, -1.4])e-3 ct s^-1 Distance: 276 arcsec from Swift/BAT position. The Swift/UVOT began settled observations of the field of GRB 190409A with the white filter 2950 s after the BAT trigger (D'Ai et al., GCN Circ. 24081). No optical afterglow is detected in the initial UVOT exposure. Given the lowered significance of the BAT trigger from the ground analysis, the lack of a clear X-ray/UVOT counterpart within the BAT error circle, we believe that GRB 190409A was most likely a spurious event.