Here we comapare the angular resolution, efficiency and fake rate for
upgoing neutrinos using several lengths to cut. However, a fair
comparison has to be done at the same level of efficiency, as done in
the table shown in the main page.
|
Sieglinde version
|
Strategy
|
Angular resolution
|
Efficiency (%)
|
Fake rate (%)
|
Up-going neutrinos (E-2)
|
SLART
|
JAMS (length>132)
|
6.5±0.1
|
61±2
|
3.7±0.5
|
DW (length>132)
|
7.5±0.1 | 78±3 | 6.5±0.5
|
|
Sieglinde version
|
Strategy
|
Angular resolution
|
Efficiency (%)
|
Fake rate (%)
|
Up-going neutrinos (E-2)
|
SLART
|
JAMS (length>166)
|
5.6±0.1 |
44±2 |
2.8±0.5 |
DW (length>166)
|
6.5±0.1
|
61±2
|
4.5±0.5
|
|
Sieglinde version
|
Strategy
|
Angular resolution
|
Efficiency (%)
|
Fake rate (%)
|
Up-going neutrinos (E-2)
|
SLART
|
JAMS (length>0)
|
9.6±0.1
|
98±3
|
9.2±0.6
|
DW (length>0)
|
9.0±0.1 |
93±3 |
10.4±0.7 |