Reconstruction Algorithm Comparison
 

  » Introduction

  » Monte Carlo sample

  » Processing times



  » Trigger level
      » effective area
      » angular resol. vs energy
      » efficiency
      » energy spectra
      » angular resol. vs declination
      » events vs azimuth
      » fakes
      » summay table

      » comparison 9, 21, 80 lines
      » check retriggering


  » Cut set 1
      » effective area
      » angular resol. vs energy
      » efficiency
      » energy spectra
      » angular resol. vs declination
      » events vs azimuth
      » fakes
      » summay table

      » comparison 9, 21, 80 lines
      » check retriggering


 » Cut set 2
      » effective area
      » angular resol. vs energy
      » efficiency
      » energy spectra
      » angular resol. vs declination
      » events vs azimuth
      » fakes
      » summay table

      » comparison 9, 21, 80 lines
      » check retriggering


 » Cut set 3
      » effective area
      » angular resol. vs energy
      » efficiency
      » energy spectra
      » angular resol. vs declination
      » events vs azimuth
      » fakes
      » summay table

      » comparison 9, 21, 80 lines
      » check retriggering


  »  Event rates  vs  zenith cut
     » corsika events
     » cosmic signal
     » atmospheric neutrinos



  »  Preliminary conclusions
 



Comments to:
zornoza@icecube.wisc.edu

Cut Set 1

This cut is defined as:
  • |Sdir|<0.6
  • Ndir>=8
  • Ldir>150 m

Effective areas

9 lines


Effective area for first guesses

Effective area for log-likelihoods

Effective area for different angular ranges

21 lines


Effective area for first guesses

Effective area for log-likelihoods

Effective area for different angular ranges

80 lines


Effective area for first guesses

Effective area for log-likelihoods

Effective area for different angular ranges


Angular resolution vs energy




  9 lines

21 lines

80 lines


Efficiency

first guesses


9 lines

21 lines

80 lines

log-likelihoods


9 lines

21 lines

80 lines

Energy spectra

9 lines


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos

21 lines


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos

80 lines


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos


Angular resolution vs declination


9 lines


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos

21 lines


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos

80 lines


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos


Events vs. azimuth




9 lines

21 lines

80 lines


Cumulative distributions


9 lines



corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos

21 lines



corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos


80 lines


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos


corsika events

atmospheric neutrinos

cosmic neutrinos

Fake rates


9 lines - Corsika




9 lines - Atmospheric neutrinos




9 lines - Cosmic neutrinos



21 lines - Corsika



  21 lines - Atmospheric neutrinos



21 lines - Cosmic neutrinos


80 lines - Corsika



  80 lines - Atmospheric neutrinos


80 lines - Cosmic neutrinos



Summary table

The tables below correspond to the following strucuture:
9 lines, corsika
9 lines, atmospheric neutrinos
9 lines, cosmic neutrinos
21 lines, corsika 21 lines, atmospheric neutrinos 21 lines, cosmic neutrinos
80 lines, corsika 80 lines, atmospheric neutrinos 80 lines, cosmic neutrinos




Comparison 9, 21 and 80 lines





Checks on retriggering

We are using the module DAQRetriggeringModule created by Phil Roth to retrigger files generated with 80 with only 21 lines. In order to check that everything goes as expected, we also reconstructed some files generated with 80 lines and retriggering them with 9 lines.